BVV vs CHO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and CHO (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BVV | CHO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.65% | −2.41% | −1.30% |
| 1 week | −1.99% | −3.88% | −2.06% |
| 1 month | −8.74% | −6.70% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | −1.77% | −1.55% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | 21.70% | −1.17% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 46.65% | 14.56% | 20.08% |
| 1 year | 55.00% | 21.47% | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 0.00% | 175.30% | 156.57% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BVV vs CHO Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and CHO (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BVV leads in 6 and CHO leads in 4. BVV is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; CHO is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BVV leads (−1.65% vs −2.41%). 1 week: BVV leads (−1.99% vs −3.88%). 1 month: CHO leads (−6.70% vs −8.74%). 3 months: CHO leads (−1.55% vs −1.77%). 6 months: BVV leads (21.70% vs −1.17%). YTD: BVV leads (46.65% vs 14.56%). 1 year: BVV leads (55.00% vs 21.47%). 3 years: CHO leads (175.30% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): CHO leads (56.4M vs 55.7M). Investors: BVV leads (795 vs 242).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BVV or CHO?
Year to date BVV returned 46.65% and CHO returned 14.56%; over the last year BVV returned 55.00% and CHO returned 21.47%. Over the last month BVV returned −8.74% and CHO returned −6.70%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BVV or CHO?
As of October 23, 2026, BVV has a size of TRY 55.7M with 795 investors, while CHO has a size of TRY 56.4M with 242 investors. CHO leads in size and BVV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BVV and CHO mean?
The CMB risk score of BVV is 6 out of 7 and that of CHO is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.