Yatırımcı.AI

CHA vs MHU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHA (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

CHAMHU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CHA vs MHU Fund Comparison
MetricCHAMHUCategory median
Daily−1.73%−1.82%−1.35%
1 week−3.35%−4.83%−2.09%
1 month−5.01%−7.14%−4.70%
3 months−3.41%−5.90%−1.44%
6 months−2.24%−0.98%2.69%
YTD13.59%19.84%20.04%
1 year23.64%26.06%28.83%
3 years206.83%163.73%156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CHA vs MHU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHA (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CHA leads in 6 and MHU leads in 4. CHA is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHU is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CHA leads (−1.73% vs −1.82%). 1 week: CHA leads (−3.35% vs −4.83%). 1 month: CHA leads (−5.01% vs −7.14%). 3 months: CHA leads (−3.41% vs −5.90%). 6 months: MHU leads (−0.98% vs −2.24%). YTD: MHU leads (19.84% vs 13.59%). 1 year: MHU leads (26.06% vs 23.64%). 3 years: CHA leads (206.83% vs 163.73%). Size (TRY): CHA leads (35.6M vs 31.4M). Investors: MHU leads (494 vs 191).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CHA returned 13.59% and MHU returned 19.84%; over the last year CHA returned 23.64% and MHU returned 26.06%. Over the last month CHA returned −5.01% and MHU returned −7.14%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, CHA has a size of TRY 35.6M with 191 investors, while MHU has a size of TRY 31.4M with 494 investors. CHA leads in size and MHU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHA is 5 out of 7 and that of MHU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.