Yatırımcı.AI

CFO vs UPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) and UPP (Ünlü Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

CFOUPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CFO vs UPP Fund Comparison
MetricCFOUPPCategory median
Daily0.30%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.68%0.67%0.68%
1 month3.05%3.04%3.04%
3 months9.56%9.47%9.49%
6 months21.37%20.97%21.05%
YTD37.50%36.79%36.77%
1 year46.09%45.27%45.27%
3 years44.62%256.53%255.19%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CFO vs UPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) and UPP (Ünlü Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CFO leads in 7 and UPP leads in 4. CFO is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CFO leads (0.30% vs 0.29%). 1 week: CFO leads (0.68% vs 0.67%). 1 month: CFO leads (3.05% vs 3.04%). 3 months: CFO leads (9.56% vs 9.47%). 6 months: CFO leads (21.37% vs 20.97%). YTD: CFO leads (37.50% vs 36.79%). 1 year: CFO leads (46.09% vs 45.27%). 3 years: UPP leads (256.53% vs 44.62%). Size (TRY): UPP leads (2B vs 1.7B). Investors: UPP leads (833 vs 318). Risk: UPP leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CFO returned 37.50% and UPP returned 36.79%; over the last year CFO returned 46.09% and UPP returned 45.27%. Over the last month CFO returned 3.05% and UPP returned 3.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, CFO has a size of TRY 1.7B with 318 investors, while UPP has a size of TRY 2B with 833 investors. UPP leads in size and UPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CFO is 2 out of 7 and that of UPP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.