Yatırımcı.AI

BVZ vs TPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) side by side.

BVZTPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVZ vs TPP Fund Comparison
MetricBVZTPPCategory median
Daily0.13%−0.81%0.01%
1 week0.72%−0.05%0.30%
1 month2.89%−6.75%0.00%
3 months9.53%−1.23%3.96%
6 months21.14%9.07%8.18%
YTD36.88%23.25%15.73%
1 year46.83%49.11%20.69%
3 years286.93%225.74%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVZ vs TPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BVZ leads in 8 and TPP leads in 2. BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.13% vs −0.81%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.72% vs −0.05%). 1 month: BVZ leads (2.89% vs −6.75%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.53% vs −1.23%). 6 months: BVZ leads (21.14% vs 9.07%). YTD: BVZ leads (36.88% vs 23.25%). 1 year: TPP leads (49.11% vs 46.83%). 3 years: BVZ leads (286.93% vs 225.74%). Size (TRY): TPP leads (1.6B vs 933.7M). Investors: BVZ leads (386 vs 332).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVZ returned 36.88% and TPP returned 23.25%; over the last year BVZ returned 46.83% and TPP returned 49.11%. Over the last month BVZ returned 2.89% and TPP returned −6.75%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BVZ has a size of TRY 933.7M with 386 investors, while TPP has a size of TRY 1.6B with 332 investors. TPP leads in size and BVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVZ is 2 out of 7 and that of TPP is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.