BVV vs EVM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BVV | EVM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −3.70% | −1.41% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −0.98% | 0.14% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −10.58% | −2.07% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −0.89% | 2.02% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | 16.41% | 1.48% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 43.83% | 8.85% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 44.91% | — | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 229.94% | — | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BVV vs EVM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BVV leads in 3 and EVM leads in 5. BVV is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EVM leads (−1.41% vs −3.70%). 1 week: EVM leads (0.14% vs −0.98%). 1 month: EVM leads (−2.07% vs −10.58%). 3 months: EVM leads (2.02% vs −0.89%). 6 months: BVV leads (16.41% vs 1.48%). YTD: BVV leads (43.83% vs 8.85%). Size (TRY): EVM leads (57.5M vs 53M). Investors: BVV leads (770 vs 512).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BVV or EVM?
Year to date BVV returned 43.83% and EVM returned 8.85%; over the last year BVV returned 44.91% and EVM returned —. Over the last month BVV returned −10.58% and EVM returned −2.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BVV or EVM?
As of November 2, 2026, BVV has a size of TRY 53M with 770 investors, while EVM has a size of TRY 57.5M with 512 investors. EVM leads in size and BVV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BVV and EVM mean?
The CMB risk score of BVV is 6 out of 7 and that of EVM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.