BVD vs YLC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVD (BV Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and YLC (Ata Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BVD | YLC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.30% | −1.31% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −1.69% | −1.70% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −2.68% | −5.21% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | 1.97% | −6.53% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 13.26% | −0.65% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 35.94% | 20.08% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | — | 25.19% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | — | 75.06% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BVD vs YLC Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BVD (BV Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and YLC (Ata Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BVD leads in 7 and YLC leads in 2. BVD is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YLC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BVD leads (−0.30% vs −1.31%). 1 week: BVD leads (−1.69% vs −1.70%). 1 month: BVD leads (−2.68% vs −5.21%). 3 months: BVD leads (1.97% vs −6.53%). 6 months: BVD leads (13.26% vs −0.65%). YTD: BVD leads (35.94% vs 20.08%). Size (TRY): YLC leads (66.1M vs 50M). Investors: YLC leads (1,144 vs 155). Risk: BVD leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BVD or YLC?
Year to date BVD returned 35.94% and YLC returned 20.08%; over the last year BVD returned — and YLC returned 25.19%. Over the last month BVD returned −2.68% and YLC returned −5.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BVD or YLC?
As of October 22, 2026, BVD has a size of TRY 50M with 155 investors, while YLC has a size of TRY 66.1M with 1,144 investors. YLC leads in size and YLC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BVD and YLC mean?
The CMB risk score of BVD is 2 out of 7 and that of YLC is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.