BPS vs TSZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPS (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TSZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Taşınmaz ve İnşaat Sektörü Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BPS | TSZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −3.01% | −0.13% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −2.86% | 0.47% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −14.30% | −1.08% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −17.93% | −9.22% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | −17.79% | −9.05% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 6.68% | 4.49% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 8.89% | 5.31% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 107.09% | — | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BPS vs TSZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BPS (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TSZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Taşınmaz ve İnşaat Sektörü Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BPS leads in 3 and TSZ leads in 7. BPS is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; TSZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: TSZ leads (−0.13% vs −3.01%). 1 week: TSZ leads (0.47% vs −2.86%). 1 month: TSZ leads (−1.08% vs −14.30%). 3 months: TSZ leads (−9.22% vs −17.93%). 6 months: TSZ leads (−9.05% vs −17.79%). YTD: BPS leads (6.68% vs 4.49%). 1 year: BPS leads (8.89% vs 5.31%). Size (TRY): BPS leads (173M vs 158.6M). Investors: TSZ leads (5,651 vs 1,264). Risk: TSZ leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BPS or TSZ?
Year to date BPS returned 6.68% and TSZ returned 4.49%; over the last year BPS returned 8.89% and TSZ returned 5.31%. Over the last month BPS returned −14.30% and TSZ returned −1.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BPS or TSZ?
As of November 2, 2026, BPS has a size of TRY 173M with 1,264 investors, while TSZ has a size of TRY 158.6M with 5,651 investors. BPS leads in size and TSZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BPS and TSZ mean?
The CMB risk score of BPS is 6 out of 7 and that of TSZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.