BPN vs MHU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPN (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BPN | MHU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.10% | −1.30% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −2.24% | −3.02% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −4.98% | −5.18% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −0.90% | −4.02% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | −1.06% | 0.85% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 22.25% | 22.06% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 39.70% | 29.04% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 164.79% | 168.62% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BPN vs MHU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BPN (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BPN leads in 8 and MHU leads in 2. BPN is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHU is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BPN leads (−1.10% vs −1.30%). 1 week: BPN leads (−2.24% vs −3.02%). 1 month: BPN leads (−4.98% vs −5.18%). 3 months: BPN leads (−0.90% vs −4.02%). 6 months: MHU leads (0.85% vs −1.06%). YTD: BPN leads (22.25% vs 22.06%). 1 year: BPN leads (39.70% vs 29.04%). 3 years: MHU leads (168.62% vs 164.79%). Size (TRY): BPN leads (39.3M vs 32M). Investors: BPN leads (612 vs 494).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BPN or MHU?
Year to date BPN returned 22.25% and MHU returned 22.06%; over the last year BPN returned 39.70% and MHU returned 29.04%. Over the last month BPN returned −4.98% and MHU returned −5.18%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BPN or MHU?
As of October 22, 2026, BPN has a size of TRY 39.3M with 612 investors, while MHU has a size of TRY 32M with 494 investors. BPN leads in size and BPN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BPN and MHU mean?
The CMB risk score of BPN is 5 out of 7 and that of MHU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.