Yatırımcı.AI

BPN vs EML Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPN (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.

BPNEML
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BPN vs EML Fund Comparison
MetricBPNEMLCategory median
Daily0.21%0.01%0.32%
1 week0.41%−0.04%0.42%
1 month−1.18%−5.40%−1.48%
3 months3.88%−2.63%4.48%
6 months12.30%11.44%14.82%
YTD27.37%22.54%25.33%
1 year41.08%—35.72%
3 years167.51%—161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BPN vs EML Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BPN (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BPN leads in 7 and EML leads in 2. BPN is a Variable Fund fund managed by Bnp Parıbas Cardıf Emeklilik A.Ş.; EML is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BPN leads (0.21% vs 0.01%). 1 week: BPN leads (0.41% vs −0.04%). 1 month: BPN leads (−1.18% vs −5.40%). 3 months: BPN leads (3.88% vs −2.63%). 6 months: BPN leads (12.30% vs 11.44%). YTD: BPN leads (27.37% vs 22.54%). Size (TRY): BPN leads (41.9M vs 38.9M). Investors: EML leads (896 vs 622). Risk: EML leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BPN returned 27.37% and EML returned 22.54%; over the last year BPN returned 41.08% and EML returned —. Over the last month BPN returned −1.18% and EML returned −5.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BPN has a size of TRY 41.9M with 622 investors, while EML has a size of TRY 38.9M with 896 investors. BPN leads in size and EML leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BPN is 5 out of 7 and that of EML is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.