Yatırımcı.AI

BPH vs MAC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPH (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MAC (Marmara Capıtal Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) side by side.

BPHMAC
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BPH vs MAC Fund Comparison
MetricBPHMACCategory median
Today (est.)—−2.30%−2.42%
Daily0.24%0.70%0.47%
1 week0.05%−1.57%−0.04%
1 month−4.38%−7.82%−5.83%
3 months−1.37%−12.26%−2.72%
6 months5.02%−2.46%8.69%
YTD16.96%3.79%19.95%
1 year19.94%7.26%22.69%
3 years100.35%54.96%94.93%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 12:25.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BPH vs MAC comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BPH (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MAC (Marmara Capıtal Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BPH leads in 9 and MAC leads in 2. BPH is a Stock Fund fund managed by Bnp Parıbas Cardıf Emeklilik A.Ş.; MAC is a Stock Fund fund managed by Marmara Capital Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MAC leads (0.70% vs 0.24%). 1 week: BPH leads (0.05% vs −1.57%). 1 month: BPH leads (−4.38% vs −7.82%). 3 months: BPH leads (−1.37% vs −12.26%). 6 months: BPH leads (5.02% vs −2.46%). YTD: BPH leads (16.96% vs 3.79%). 1 year: BPH leads (19.94% vs 7.26%). 3 years: BPH leads (100.35% vs 54.96%). Size (TRY): BPH leads (4B vs 3.8B). Investors: BPH leads (52,020 vs 32,745). Risk: MAC leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BPH returned 16.96% and MAC returned 3.79%; over the last year BPH returned 19.94% and MAC returned 7.26%. Over the last month BPH returned −4.38% and MAC returned −7.82%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BPH has a size of TRY 4B with 52,020 investors, while MAC has a size of TRY 3.8B with 32,745 investors. BPH leads in size and BPH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BPH is 7 out of 7 and that of MAC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.