BPH vs MAC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPH (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MAC (Marmara Capital Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BPH | MAC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 1.30% | 1.29% |
| Daily | −0.25% | −1.80% | −0.44% |
| 1 week | 2.16% | −1.22% | 1.23% |
| 1 month | −3.88% | −8.72% | −4.79% |
| 3 months | −6.30% | −17.66% | −7.87% |
| 6 months | −14.33% | −24.52% | −14.17% |
| YTD | 8.71% | −6.02% | 10.17% |
| 1 year | 18.03% | −5.86% | 17.96% |
| 3 years | 87.78% | 50.12% | 87.89% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BPH vs MAC Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BPH (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MAC (Marmara Capital Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BPH leads in 10 and MAC leads in 1. BPH is a Stock Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; MAC is a Stock Fund fund managed by Marmara Capital Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BPH leads (−0.25% vs −1.80%). 1 week: BPH leads (2.16% vs −1.22%). 1 month: BPH leads (−3.88% vs −8.72%). 3 months: BPH leads (−6.30% vs −17.66%). 6 months: BPH leads (−14.33% vs −24.52%). YTD: BPH leads (8.71% vs −6.02%). 1 year: BPH leads (18.03% vs −5.86%). 3 years: BPH leads (87.78% vs 50.12%). Size (TRY): BPH leads (3.6B vs 3.3B). Investors: BPH leads (51,113 vs 30,414). Risk: MAC leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BPH or MAC?
Year to date BPH returned 8.71% and MAC returned −6.02%; over the last year BPH returned 18.03% and MAC returned −5.86%. Over the last month BPH returned −3.88% and MAC returned −8.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BPH or MAC?
As of November 12, 2026, BPH has a size of TRY 3.6B with 51,113 investors, while MAC has a size of TRY 3.3B with 30,414 investors. BPH leads in size and BPH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BPH and MAC mean?
The CMB risk score of BPH is 7 out of 7 and that of MAC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.