BNO vs KLT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNO (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.ş Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KLT (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BNO | KLT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.25% | 0.53% | 0.47% |
| 1 week | −1.04% | −0.79% | −0.04% |
| 1 month | −1.39% | −9.12% | −5.83% |
| 3 months | 3.95% | −2.83% | −2.72% |
| 6 months | 13.66% | 15.57% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 25.04% | 29.47% | 19.95% |
| 1 year | 32.35% | 28.27% | 22.69% |
| 3 years | 150.68% | 93.95% | 94.93% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BNO vs KLT comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNO (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.ş Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KLT (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BNO leads in 4 and KLT leads in 6. BNO is a Stock Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; KLT is a Stock Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.ş.
Highlights: Daily: KLT leads (0.53% vs −0.25%). 1 week: KLT leads (−0.79% vs −1.04%). 1 month: BNO leads (−1.39% vs −9.12%). 3 months: BNO leads (3.95% vs −2.83%). 6 months: KLT leads (15.57% vs 13.66%). YTD: KLT leads (29.47% vs 25.04%). 1 year: BNO leads (32.35% vs 28.27%). 3 years: BNO leads (150.68% vs 93.95%). Size (TRY): KLT leads (1.6B vs 1.5B). Investors: KLT leads (36,985 vs 35,916).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, BNO or KLT?
Year to date BNO returned 25.04% and KLT returned 29.47%; over the last year BNO returned 32.35% and KLT returned 28.27%. Over the last month BNO returned −1.39% and KLT returned −9.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNO or KLT?
As of September 28, 2026, BNO has a size of TRY 1.5B with 35,916 investors, while KLT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 36,985 investors. KLT leads in size and KLT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNO and KLT mean?
The CMB risk score of BNO is 6 out of 7 and that of KLT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.