BLD vs NSA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and NSA (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BLD | NSA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 2.95% | 2.98% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.70% | 9.87% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 20.99% | 21.43% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 35.20% | 36.18% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 45.19% | 46.33% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 48.61% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BLD vs NSA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and NSA (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BLD leads in 2 and NSA leads in 7. BLD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NSA leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: NSA leads (0.68% vs 0.67%). 1 month: NSA leads (2.98% vs 2.95%). 3 months: NSA leads (9.87% vs 9.70%). 6 months: NSA leads (21.43% vs 20.99%). YTD: NSA leads (36.18% vs 35.20%). 1 year: NSA leads (46.33% vs 45.19%). Size (TRY): BLD leads (381.5M vs 365.9M). Investors: BLD leads (659 vs 241).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BLD or NSA?
Year to date BLD returned 35.20% and NSA returned 36.18%; over the last year BLD returned 45.19% and NSA returned 46.33%. Over the last month BLD returned 2.95% and NSA returned 2.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BLD or NSA?
As of October 23, 2026, BLD has a size of TRY 381.5M with 659 investors, while NSA has a size of TRY 365.9M with 241 investors. BLD leads in size and BLD leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BLD and NSA mean?
The CMB risk score of BLD is 2 out of 7 and that of NSA is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.