BLD vs FSH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BLD | FSH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | −0.22% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 1.22% | 0.53% |
| 1 month | 2.98% | 3.34% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.87% | 8.01% | 3.74% |
| 6 months | 21.04% | 37.22% | 9.91% |
| YTD | 33.40% | 40.11% | 15.04% |
| 1 year | 45.40% | 44.09% | 20.96% |
| 3 years | — | 268.25% | 107.79% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BLD vs FSH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 9, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BLD leads in 6 and FSH leads in 4. BLD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BLD leads (0.10% vs −0.22%). 1 week: FSH leads (1.22% vs 0.67%). 1 month: FSH leads (3.34% vs 2.98%). 3 months: BLD leads (9.87% vs 8.01%). 6 months: FSH leads (37.22% vs 21.04%). YTD: FSH leads (40.11% vs 33.40%). 1 year: BLD leads (45.40% vs 44.09%). Size (TRY): BLD leads (382.2M vs 379.2M). Investors: BLD leads (660 vs 450). Risk: BLD leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BLD or FSH?
Year to date BLD returned 33.40% and FSH returned 40.11%; over the last year BLD returned 45.40% and FSH returned 44.09%. Over the last month BLD returned 2.98% and FSH returned 3.34%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BLD or FSH?
As of October 9, 2026, BLD has a size of TRY 382.2M with 660 investors, while FSH has a size of TRY 379.2M with 450 investors. BLD leads in size and BLD leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BLD and FSH mean?
The CMB risk score of BLD is 2 out of 7 and that of FSH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.