Yatırımcı.AI

BJD vs NBZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NBZ (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

BJDNBZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BJD vs NBZ Fund Comparison
MetricBJDNBZCategory median
Daily0.18%0.05%0.16%
1 week0.49%0.30%0.46%
1 month1.96%1.73%1.10%
3 months5.86%5.93%3.53%
6 months12.20%12.46%8.53%
YTD18.73%19.61%16.18%
1 year22.06%23.63%19.94%
3 years89.45%98.48%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BJD vs NBZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NBZ (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BJD leads in 4 and NBZ leads in 6. BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BJD leads (0.18% vs 0.05%). 1 week: BJD leads (0.49% vs 0.30%). 1 month: BJD leads (1.96% vs 1.73%). 3 months: NBZ leads (5.93% vs 5.86%). 6 months: NBZ leads (12.46% vs 12.20%). YTD: NBZ leads (19.61% vs 18.73%). 1 year: NBZ leads (23.63% vs 22.06%). 3 years: NBZ leads (98.48% vs 89.45%). Size (TRY): BJD leads (933.5M vs 921.4M). Investors: NBZ leads (148 vs 101).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BJD returned 18.73% and NBZ returned 19.61%; over the last year BJD returned 22.06% and NBZ returned 23.63%. Over the last month BJD returned 1.96% and NBZ returned 1.73%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BJD has a size of TRY 933.5M with 101 investors, while NBZ has a size of TRY 921.4M with 148 investors. BJD leads in size and NBZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BJD is — out of 7 and that of NBZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.