Yatırımcı.AI

BIO vs ICZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIO (İş Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ICZ (Ak Portföy Teknoloji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

BIOICZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BIO vs ICZ Fund Comparison
MetricBIOICZCategory median
Today (est.)−2.90%−2.48%−2.78%
Daily−2.10%−1.61%−1.84%
1 week−3.72%−6.46%−4.21%
1 month−9.42%−11.88%−9.02%
3 months−11.44%−27.23%−10.58%
6 months−15.71%−18.00%−9.82%
YTD2.38%8.30%9.80%
1 year9.68%10.75%18.36%
3 years80.87%118.19%93.24%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BIO vs ICZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BIO (İş Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ICZ (Ak Portföy Teknoloji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BIO leads in 4 and ICZ leads in 7. BIO is a Stock Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ICZ is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): ICZ leads (−2.48% vs −2.90%). Daily: ICZ leads (−1.61% vs −2.10%). 1 week: BIO leads (−3.72% vs −6.46%). 1 month: BIO leads (−9.42% vs −11.88%). 3 months: BIO leads (−11.44% vs −27.23%). 6 months: BIO leads (−15.71% vs −18.00%). YTD: ICZ leads (8.30% vs 2.38%). 1 year: ICZ leads (10.75% vs 9.68%). 3 years: ICZ leads (118.19% vs 80.87%). Size (TRY): ICZ leads (672.9M vs 640.1M). Investors: ICZ leads (20,299 vs 8,951).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BIO returned 2.38% and ICZ returned 8.30%; over the last year BIO returned 9.68% and ICZ returned 10.75%. Over the last month BIO returned −9.42% and ICZ returned −11.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BIO has a size of TRY 640.1M with 8,951 investors, while ICZ has a size of TRY 672.9M with 20,299 investors. ICZ leads in size and ICZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BIO is 6 out of 7 and that of ICZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.