Yatırımcı.AI

BEK vs MEB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BEK (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Fiba Portföy Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MEB (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BEKMEB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BEK vs MEB Fund Comparison
MetricBEKMEBCategory median
Daily−0.06%−0.07%0.07%
1 week0.08%0.33%0.57%
1 month1.29%2.02%2.46%
3 months7.40%9.33%9.39%
6 months12.20%15.60%16.05%
YTD19.01%22.74%25.12%
1 year30.97%—38.90%
3 years146.06%—178.72%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BEK vs MEB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BEK (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Fiba Portföy Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MEB (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BEK leads in 3 and MEB leads in 6. BEK is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MEB is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BEK leads (−0.06% vs −0.07%). 1 week: MEB leads (0.33% vs 0.08%). 1 month: MEB leads (2.02% vs 1.29%). 3 months: MEB leads (9.33% vs 7.40%). 6 months: MEB leads (15.60% vs 12.20%). YTD: MEB leads (22.74% vs 19.01%). Size (TRY): BEK leads (561.4M vs 76M). Investors: BEK leads (34,298 vs 4,882). Risk: MEB leads (3 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BEK returned 19.01% and MEB returned 22.74%; over the last year BEK returned 30.97% and MEB returned —. Over the last month BEK returned 1.29% and MEB returned 2.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BEK has a size of TRY 561.4M with 34,298 investors, while MEB has a size of TRY 76M with 4,882 investors. BEK leads in size and BEK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BEK is 4 out of 7 and that of MEB is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.