Yatırımcı.AI

BEH vs KLT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BEH (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KLT (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BEHKLT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BEH vs KLT Fund Comparison
MetricBEHKLTCategory median
Daily−3.40%−3.22%−3.03%
1 week−2.95%−3.03%−3.00%
1 month−11.29%−13.93%−11.63%
3 months−12.11%−18.47%−13.94%
6 months−13.41%−12.24%−14.98%
YTD7.02%10.80%2.54%
1 year5.95%7.51%4.18%
3 years67.62%77.22%79.59%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BEH vs KLT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BEH (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KLT (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BEH leads in 3 and KLT leads in 7. BEH is a Stock Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; KLT is a Stock Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KLT leads (−3.22% vs −3.40%). 1 week: BEH leads (−2.95% vs −3.03%). 1 month: BEH leads (−11.29% vs −13.93%). 3 months: BEH leads (−12.11% vs −18.47%). 6 months: KLT leads (−12.24% vs −13.41%). YTD: KLT leads (10.80% vs 7.02%). 1 year: KLT leads (7.51% vs 5.95%). 3 years: KLT leads (77.22% vs 67.62%). Size (TRY): KLT leads (1.2B vs 1.1B). Investors: KLT leads (33,640 vs 20,265).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BEH returned 7.02% and KLT returned 10.80%; over the last year BEH returned 5.95% and KLT returned 7.51%. Over the last month BEH returned −11.29% and KLT returned −13.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BEH has a size of TRY 1.1B with 20,265 investors, while KLT has a size of TRY 1.2B with 33,640 investors. KLT leads in size and KLT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BEH is 6 out of 7 and that of KLT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.