EIH vs KLT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EIH (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Oyak Portföy Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KLT (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EIH | KLT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.47% |
| 1 week | 0.22% | −0.79% | −0.04% |
| 1 month | −2.47% | −9.12% | −5.83% |
| 3 months | 2.67% | −2.83% | −2.72% |
| 6 months | 12.08% | 15.57% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 24.70% | 29.47% | 19.95% |
| 1 year | 30.92% | 28.27% | 22.69% |
| 3 years | 111.85% | 93.95% | 94.93% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EIH vs KLT comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EIH (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Oyak Portföy Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KLT (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EIH leads in 5 and KLT leads in 5. EIH is a Stock Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; KLT is a Stock Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.ş.
Highlights: Daily: KLT leads (0.53% vs 0.46%). 1 week: EIH leads (0.22% vs −0.79%). 1 month: EIH leads (−2.47% vs −9.12%). 3 months: EIH leads (2.67% vs −2.83%). 6 months: KLT leads (15.57% vs 12.08%). YTD: KLT leads (29.47% vs 24.70%). 1 year: EIH leads (30.92% vs 28.27%). 3 years: EIH leads (111.85% vs 93.95%). Size (TRY): KLT leads (1.6B vs 1.6B). Investors: KLT leads (36,985 vs 22,967).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EIH or KLT?
Year to date EIH returned 24.70% and KLT returned 29.47%; over the last year EIH returned 30.92% and KLT returned 28.27%. Over the last month EIH returned −2.47% and KLT returned −9.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EIH or KLT?
As of September 28, 2026, EIH has a size of TRY 1.6B with 22,967 investors, while KLT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 36,985 investors. KLT leads in size and KLT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EIH and KLT mean?
The CMB risk score of EIH is 6 out of 7 and that of KLT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.