Yatırımcı.AI

BDA vs NCS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BDA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and NCS (Nurol Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

BDANCS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BDA vs NCS Fund Comparison
MetricBDANCSCategory median
Daily0.11%0.07%0.05%
1 week0.74%0.55%0.44%
1 month−0.39%2.22%0.38%
3 months4.01%6.58%3.95%
6 months7.01%13.34%8.45%
YTD12.62%20.27%16.06%
1 year17.17%24.24%20.98%
3 years—114.01%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BDA vs NCS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BDA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and NCS (Nurol Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BDA leads in 3 and NCS leads in 6. BDA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NCS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BDA leads (0.11% vs 0.07%). 1 week: BDA leads (0.74% vs 0.55%). 1 month: NCS leads (2.22% vs −0.39%). 3 months: NCS leads (6.58% vs 4.01%). 6 months: NCS leads (13.34% vs 7.01%). YTD: NCS leads (20.27% vs 12.62%). 1 year: NCS leads (24.24% vs 17.17%). Size (TRY): BDA leads (4.4B vs 3.5B). Investors: NCS leads (1,053 vs 762).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BDA returned 12.62% and NCS returned 20.27%; over the last year BDA returned 17.17% and NCS returned 24.24%. Over the last month BDA returned −0.39% and NCS returned 2.22%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BDA has a size of TRY 4.4B with 762 investors, while NCS has a size of TRY 3.5B with 1,053 investors. BDA leads in size and NCS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BDA is — out of 7 and that of NCS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.