Yatırımcı.AI

AZS vs BNS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AZS (Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BNS (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AZSBNS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AZS vs BNS Fund Comparison
MetricAZSBNSCategory median
Daily0.29%0.25%0.26%
1 week0.54%0.51%0.48%
1 month0.25%−0.02%0.23%
3 months6.46%3.90%5.55%
6 months15.72%14.36%15.94%
YTD22.31%19.06%19.06%
1 year34.61%31.36%31.36%
3 years163.20%152.05%150.68%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AZS vs BNS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AZS (Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BNS (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AZS leads in 10 and BNS leads in 1. AZS is a Standard Fund fund managed by Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; BNS is a Standard Fund fund managed by Bnp Parıbas Cardıf Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AZS leads (0.29% vs 0.25%). 1 week: AZS leads (0.54% vs 0.51%). 1 month: AZS leads (0.25% vs −0.02%). 3 months: AZS leads (6.46% vs 3.90%). 6 months: AZS leads (15.72% vs 14.36%). YTD: AZS leads (22.31% vs 19.06%). 1 year: AZS leads (34.61% vs 31.36%). 3 years: AZS leads (163.20% vs 152.05%). Size (TRY): AZS leads (1.2B vs 759.3M). Investors: BNS leads (42,080 vs 28,218). Risk: AZS leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AZS returned 22.31% and BNS returned 19.06%; over the last year AZS returned 34.61% and BNS returned 31.36%. Over the last month AZS returned 0.25% and BNS returned −0.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AZS has a size of TRY 1.2B with 28,218 investors, while BNS has a size of TRY 759.3M with 42,080 investors. AZS leads in size and BNS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AZS is 4 out of 7 and that of BNS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.