Yatırımcı.AI

AVN vs AZS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVN (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and AZS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AVNAZS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AVN vs AZS Fund Comparison
MetricAVNAZSCategory median
Daily0.01%0.01%0.01%
1 week1.06%1.06%1.06%
1 month0.74%0.70%1.15%
3 months5.48%5.42%5.48%
6 months7.47%7.24%8.20%
YTD23.82%23.62%21.40%
1 year33.34%33.34%32.34%
3 years161.68%164.39%151.02%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AVN vs AZS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AVN (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and AZS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AVN leads in 8 and AZS leads in 2. AVN is a Standard Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; AZS is a Standard Fund fund managed by Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AVN leads (0.01% vs 0.01%). 1 week: AZS leads (1.06% vs 1.06%). 1 month: AVN leads (0.74% vs 0.70%). 3 months: AVN leads (5.48% vs 5.42%). 6 months: AVN leads (7.47% vs 7.24%). YTD: AVN leads (23.82% vs 23.62%). 1 year: AVN leads (33.34% vs 33.34%). 3 years: AZS leads (164.39% vs 161.68%). Size (TRY): AVN leads (1.5B vs 1.2B). Investors: AVN leads (32,179 vs 27,971).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AVN returned 23.82% and AZS returned 23.62%; over the last year AVN returned 33.34% and AZS returned 33.34%. Over the last month AVN returned 0.74% and AZS returned 0.70%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, AVN has a size of TRY 1.5B with 32,179 investors, while AZS has a size of TRY 1.2B with 27,971 investors. AVN leads in size and AVN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AVN is 4 out of 7 and that of AZS is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.