Yatırımcı.AI

AVN vs AZS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and AZS (Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AVNAZS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AVN vs AZS Fund Comparison
MetricAVNAZSCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.26%
1 week0.54%0.54%0.48%
1 month0.23%0.25%0.23%
3 months6.47%6.46%5.55%
6 months16.15%15.72%15.94%
YTD22.45%22.31%19.06%
1 year34.42%34.61%31.36%
3 years161.12%163.20%150.68%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AVN vs AZS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AVN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and AZS (Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AVN leads in 7 and AZS leads in 3. AVN is a Standard Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; AZS is a Standard Fund fund managed by Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AVN leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: AVN leads (0.54% vs 0.54%). 1 month: AZS leads (0.25% vs 0.23%). 3 months: AVN leads (6.47% vs 6.46%). 6 months: AVN leads (16.15% vs 15.72%). YTD: AVN leads (22.45% vs 22.31%). 1 year: AZS leads (34.61% vs 34.42%). 3 years: AZS leads (163.20% vs 161.12%). Size (TRY): AVN leads (1.5B vs 1.2B). Investors: AVN leads (31,974 vs 28,218).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AVN returned 22.45% and AZS returned 22.31%; over the last year AVN returned 34.42% and AZS returned 34.61%. Over the last month AVN returned 0.23% and AZS returned 0.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AVN has a size of TRY 1.5B with 31,974 investors, while AZS has a size of TRY 1.2B with 28,218 investors. AVN leads in size and AVN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AVN is 4 out of 7 and that of AZS is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.