Yatırımcı.AI

AVN vs MHK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHK (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AVNMHK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AVN vs MHK Fund Comparison
MetricAVNMHKCategory median
Daily0.29%0.26%0.26%
1 week0.54%0.34%0.48%
1 month0.23%2.21%0.23%
3 months6.47%6.56%5.55%
6 months16.15%16.56%15.94%
YTD22.45%18.18%19.06%
1 year34.42%30.63%31.36%
3 years161.12%114.37%150.68%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AVN vs MHK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AVN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHK (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AVN leads in 5 and MHK leads in 5. AVN is a Standard Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHK is a Standard Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AVN leads (0.29% vs 0.26%). 1 week: AVN leads (0.54% vs 0.34%). 1 month: MHK leads (2.21% vs 0.23%). 3 months: MHK leads (6.56% vs 6.47%). 6 months: MHK leads (16.56% vs 16.15%). YTD: AVN leads (22.45% vs 18.18%). 1 year: AVN leads (34.42% vs 30.63%). 3 years: AVN leads (161.12% vs 114.37%). Size (TRY): MHK leads (2.7B vs 1.5B). Investors: MHK leads (137,023 vs 31,971).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AVN returned 22.45% and MHK returned 18.18%; over the last year AVN returned 34.42% and MHK returned 30.63%. Over the last month AVN returned 0.23% and MHK returned 2.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AVN has a size of TRY 1.5B with 31,971 investors, while MHK has a size of TRY 2.7B with 137,023 investors. MHK leads in size and MHK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AVN is 4 out of 7 and that of MHK is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.