Yatırımcı.AI

AVN vs BNS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BNS (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AVNBNS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AVN vs BNS Fund Comparison
MetricAVNBNSCategory median
Daily0.29%0.25%0.26%
1 week0.54%0.51%0.48%
1 month0.23%−0.02%0.23%
3 months6.47%3.90%5.55%
6 months16.15%14.36%15.94%
YTD22.45%19.06%19.06%
1 year34.42%31.36%31.36%
3 years161.12%152.05%150.68%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AVN vs BNS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AVN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BNS (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AVN leads in 10 and BNS leads in 1. AVN is a Standard Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; BNS is a Standard Fund fund managed by Bnp Parıbas Cardıf Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AVN leads (0.29% vs 0.25%). 1 week: AVN leads (0.54% vs 0.51%). 1 month: AVN leads (0.23% vs −0.02%). 3 months: AVN leads (6.47% vs 3.90%). 6 months: AVN leads (16.15% vs 14.36%). YTD: AVN leads (22.45% vs 19.06%). 1 year: AVN leads (34.42% vs 31.36%). 3 years: AVN leads (161.12% vs 152.05%). Size (TRY): AVN leads (1.5B vs 759.3M). Investors: BNS leads (42,080 vs 31,974). Risk: AVN leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AVN returned 22.45% and BNS returned 19.06%; over the last year AVN returned 34.42% and BNS returned 31.36%. Over the last month AVN returned 0.23% and BNS returned −0.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AVN has a size of TRY 1.5B with 31,974 investors, while BNS has a size of TRY 759.3M with 42,080 investors. AVN leads in size and BNS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AVN is 4 out of 7 and that of BNS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.