Yatırımcı.AI

ARM vs GZP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ARM (Ak Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZP (Garanti Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

ARMGZP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ARM vs GZP Fund Comparison
MetricARMGZPCategory median
Daily−0.05%0.33%0.12%
1 week0.40%0.93%0.70%
1 month3.20%0.20%−1.87%
3 months5.77%3.06%−0.82%
6 months7.77%8.95%0.51%
YTD24.69%24.93%20.46%
1 year32.16%31.14%27.26%
3 years183.37%206.36%160.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ARM vs GZP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ARM (Ak Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZP (Garanti Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ARM leads in 3 and GZP leads in 8. ARM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZP leads (0.33% vs −0.05%). 1 week: GZP leads (0.93% vs 0.40%). 1 month: ARM leads (3.20% vs 0.20%). 3 months: ARM leads (5.77% vs 3.06%). 6 months: GZP leads (8.95% vs 7.77%). YTD: GZP leads (24.93% vs 24.69%). 1 year: ARM leads (32.16% vs 31.14%). 3 years: GZP leads (206.36% vs 183.37%). Size (TRY): GZP leads (3.5B vs 2.9B). Investors: GZP leads (8,979 vs 4,702). Risk: GZP leads (3 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ARM returned 24.69% and GZP returned 24.93%; over the last year ARM returned 32.16% and GZP returned 31.14%. Over the last month ARM returned 3.20% and GZP returned 0.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, ARM has a size of TRY 2.9B with 4,702 investors, while GZP has a size of TRY 3.5B with 8,979 investors. GZP leads in size and GZP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ARM is 4 out of 7 and that of GZP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.