Yatırımcı.AI

APG vs HFS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of APG (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Yenilenebilir Enerji Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HFS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. HSBC Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

APGHFS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

APG vs HFS Fund Comparison
MetricAPGHFSCategory median
Daily0.34%−0.57%−0.33%
1 week−1.85%−1.89%−0.80%
1 month−2.53%−4.39%−2.70%
3 months0.65%−0.81%1.63%
6 months3.49%2.78%4.14%
YTD20.95%22.43%20.92%
1 year28.35%27.19%30.34%
3 years139.22%—165.29%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the APG vs HFS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of APG (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Yenilenebilir Enerji Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HFS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. HSBC Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, APG leads in 7 and HFS leads in 2. APG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; HFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: APG leads (0.34% vs −0.57%). 1 week: APG leads (−1.85% vs −1.89%). 1 month: APG leads (−2.53% vs −4.39%). 3 months: APG leads (0.65% vs −0.81%). 6 months: APG leads (3.49% vs 2.78%). YTD: HFS leads (22.43% vs 20.95%). 1 year: APG leads (28.35% vs 27.19%). Size (TRY): HFS leads (1.9B vs 1.3B). Investors: APG leads (78,243 vs 2,085).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date APG returned 20.95% and HFS returned 22.43%; over the last year APG returned 28.35% and HFS returned 27.19%. Over the last month APG returned −2.53% and HFS returned −4.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, APG has a size of TRY 1.3B with 78,243 investors, while HFS has a size of TRY 1.9B with 2,085 investors. HFS leads in size and APG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of APG is 5 out of 7 and that of HFS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.