Yatırımcı.AI

ANZ vs RBL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RBL (QNB Portföy Robotik ve Blockchain Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) side by side.

ANZRBL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANZ vs RBL Fund Comparison
MetricANZRBLCategory median
Daily−0.08%1.35%0.05%
1 week0.58%−2.75%0.44%
1 month0.46%−7.48%0.38%
3 months2.80%1.66%3.95%
6 months7.94%11.29%8.45%
YTD14.25%26.87%16.06%
1 year19.97%19.89%20.98%
3 years107.91%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANZ vs RBL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RBL (QNB Portföy Robotik ve Blockchain Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ANZ leads in 5 and RBL leads in 4. ANZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RBL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RBL leads (1.35% vs −0.08%). 1 week: ANZ leads (0.58% vs −2.75%). 1 month: ANZ leads (0.46% vs −7.48%). 3 months: ANZ leads (2.80% vs 1.66%). 6 months: RBL leads (11.29% vs 7.94%). YTD: RBL leads (26.87% vs 14.25%). 1 year: ANZ leads (19.97% vs 19.89%). Size (TRY): ANZ leads (230.3M vs 166M). Investors: RBL leads (699 vs 120).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANZ returned 14.25% and RBL returned 26.87%; over the last year ANZ returned 19.97% and RBL returned 19.89%. Over the last month ANZ returned 0.46% and RBL returned −7.48%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, ANZ has a size of TRY 230.3M with 120 investors, while RBL has a size of TRY 166M with 699 investors. ANZ leads in size and RBL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANZ is — out of 7 and that of RBL is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.