Yatırımcı.AI

ANZ vs ODP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ODP (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

ANZODP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANZ vs ODP Fund Comparison
MetricANZODPCategory median
Daily0.60%1.97%0.08%
1 week1.25%−1.97%0.69%
1 month2.76%−13.11%2.03%
3 months3.29%−5.69%3.24%
6 months9.32%2.35%8.32%
YTD16.41%24.93%17.50%
1 year20.47%30.00%21.40%
3 years106.37%214.59%105.67%
Returns are based on prices as of November 11, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANZ vs ODP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ODP (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 11, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ANZ leads in 5 and ODP leads in 5. ANZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ODP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ODP leads (1.97% vs 0.60%). 1 week: ANZ leads (1.25% vs −1.97%). 1 month: ANZ leads (2.76% vs −13.11%). 3 months: ANZ leads (3.29% vs −5.69%). 6 months: ANZ leads (9.32% vs 2.35%). YTD: ODP leads (24.93% vs 16.41%). 1 year: ODP leads (30.00% vs 20.47%). 3 years: ODP leads (214.59% vs 106.37%). Size (TRY): ODP leads (237.4M vs 231.6M). Investors: ANZ leads (118 vs 116).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANZ returned 16.41% and ODP returned 24.93%; over the last year ANZ returned 20.47% and ODP returned 30.00%. Over the last month ANZ returned 2.76% and ODP returned −13.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 11, 2026, ANZ has a size of TRY 231.6M with 118 investors, while ODP has a size of TRY 237.4M with 116 investors. ODP leads in size and ANZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANZ is — out of 7 and that of ODP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.