ANZ vs HAR Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and HAR (BV Portföy Harmony Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ANZ | HAR | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.08% | −37.52% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.58% | −38.98% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 0.46% | −71.57% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 2.80% | −70.20% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 7.94% | −70.33% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 14.25% | −65.44% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 19.97% | −68.75% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 107.91% | — | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ANZ vs HAR Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and HAR (BV Portföy Harmony Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ANZ leads in 9 and HAR leads in 0. ANZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HAR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ANZ leads (−0.08% vs −37.52%). 1 week: ANZ leads (0.58% vs −38.98%). 1 month: ANZ leads (0.46% vs −71.57%). 3 months: ANZ leads (2.80% vs −70.20%). 6 months: ANZ leads (7.94% vs −70.33%). YTD: ANZ leads (14.25% vs −65.44%). 1 year: ANZ leads (19.97% vs −68.75%). Size (TRY): ANZ leads (230.3M vs 145.1M). Investors: ANZ leads (120 vs 48).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ANZ or HAR?
Year to date ANZ returned 14.25% and HAR returned −65.44%; over the last year ANZ returned 19.97% and HAR returned −68.75%. Over the last month ANZ returned 0.46% and HAR returned −71.57%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ANZ or HAR?
As of October 22, 2026, ANZ has a size of TRY 230.3M with 120 investors, while HAR has a size of TRY 145.1M with 48 investors. ANZ leads in size and ANZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ANZ and HAR mean?
The CMB risk score of ANZ is — out of 7 and that of HAR is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.