Yatırımcı.AI

ANE vs IEK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANE (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IEK (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ANEIEK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANE vs IEK Fund Comparison
MetricANEIEKCategory median
Daily−0.64%−0.88%−0.54%
1 week−1.49%−1.73%−0.93%
1 month−2.80%−1.97%−1.26%
3 months0.73%2.92%5.60%
6 months12.50%12.71%16.79%
YTD19.92%23.38%23.33%
1 year31.20%30.84%32.63%
3 years128.62%121.43%179.55%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANE vs IEK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANE (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IEK (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ANE leads in 4 and IEK leads in 6. ANE is a Mixed Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; IEK is a Mixed Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ANE leads (−0.64% vs −0.88%). 1 week: ANE leads (−1.49% vs −1.73%). 1 month: IEK leads (−1.97% vs −2.80%). 3 months: IEK leads (2.92% vs 0.73%). 6 months: IEK leads (12.71% vs 12.50%). YTD: IEK leads (23.38% vs 19.92%). 1 year: ANE leads (31.20% vs 30.84%). 3 years: ANE leads (128.62% vs 121.43%). Size (TRY): IEK leads (692.8M vs 113.6M). Investors: IEK leads (82,174 vs 22,201).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANE returned 19.92% and IEK returned 23.38%; over the last year ANE returned 31.20% and IEK returned 30.84%. Over the last month ANE returned −2.80% and IEK returned −1.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, ANE has a size of TRY 113.6M with 22,201 investors, while IEK has a size of TRY 692.8M with 82,174 investors. IEK leads in size and IEK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANE is 4 out of 7 and that of IEK is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.