AMZ vs BNA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AMZ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BNA (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AMZ | BNA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.55% | −0.42% | −0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.67% | −0.74% | −0.74% |
| 1 month | −2.91% | −3.08% | −3.05% |
| 3 months | 2.47% | 2.77% | 2.83% |
| 6 months | −4.21% | −3.76% | −4.12% |
| YTD | 1.78% | 3.19% | 2.06% |
| 1 year | 12.34% | 13.95% | 12.48% |
| 3 years | 239.22% | 255.95% | 236.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AMZ vs BNA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AMZ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BNA (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AMZ leads in 5 and BNA leads in 6. AMZ is a Gold Fund fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; BNA is a Gold Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BNA leads (−0.42% vs −0.55%). 1 week: AMZ leads (−0.67% vs −0.74%). 1 month: AMZ leads (−2.91% vs −3.08%). 3 months: BNA leads (2.77% vs 2.47%). 6 months: BNA leads (−3.76% vs −4.21%). YTD: BNA leads (3.19% vs 1.78%). 1 year: BNA leads (13.95% vs 12.34%). 3 years: BNA leads (255.95% vs 239.22%). Size (TRY): AMZ leads (133B vs 15.3B). Investors: AMZ leads (709,343 vs 150,282). Risk: AMZ leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AMZ or BNA?
Year to date AMZ returned 1.78% and BNA returned 3.19%; over the last year AMZ returned 12.34% and BNA returned 13.95%. Over the last month AMZ returned −2.91% and BNA returned −3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AMZ or BNA?
As of November 2, 2026, AMZ has a size of TRY 133B with 709,343 investors, while BNA has a size of TRY 15.3B with 150,282 investors. AMZ leads in size and AMZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AMZ and BNA mean?
The CMB risk score of AMZ is 6 out of 7 and that of BNA is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.