AJP vs MHN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AJP (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHN (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AJP | MHN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.89% | −1.50% | −1.35% |
| 1 week | −4.02% | −2.81% | −2.09% |
| 1 month | −8.12% | −4.25% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | −3.96% | −0.95% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | −3.61% | 3.62% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 19.68% | 23.61% | 20.04% |
| 1 year | 27.02% | 34.28% | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 156.52% | 168.68% | 156.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AJP vs MHN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AJP (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHN (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AJP leads in 1 and MHN leads in 10. AJP is a Variable Fund fund managed by AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHN is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHN leads (−1.50% vs −1.89%). 1 week: MHN leads (−2.81% vs −4.02%). 1 month: MHN leads (−4.25% vs −8.12%). 3 months: MHN leads (−0.95% vs −3.96%). 6 months: MHN leads (3.62% vs −3.61%). YTD: MHN leads (23.61% vs 19.68%). 1 year: MHN leads (34.28% vs 27.02%). 3 years: MHN leads (168.68% vs 156.52%). Size (TRY): MHN leads (33.4M vs 29.8M). Investors: AJP leads (429 vs 411). Risk: MHN leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AJP or MHN?
Year to date AJP returned 19.68% and MHN returned 23.61%; over the last year AJP returned 27.02% and MHN returned 34.28%. Over the last month AJP returned −8.12% and MHN returned −4.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AJP or MHN?
As of October 23, 2026, AJP has a size of TRY 29.8M with 429 investors, while MHN has a size of TRY 33.4M with 411 investors. MHN leads in size and AJP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AJP and MHN mean?
The CMB risk score of AJP is 5 out of 7 and that of MHN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.