Yatırımcı.AI

AHV vs EPK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AHV (Azimut Portföy Dengeli Fon Sepeti Fonu) and EPK (Emaa Blue Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

AHVEPK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AHV vs EPK Fund Comparison
MetricAHVEPKCategory median
Daily−0.82%−4.41%−1.33%
1 week−0.33%−3.85%−0.68%
1 month−1.85%−9.80%−2.96%
3 months2.01%−4.35%0.00%
6 months9.05%−14.56%2.05%
YTD27.51%−11.55%17.79%
1 year33.83%—24.45%
3 years172.19%—158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AHV vs EPK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AHV (Azimut Portföy Dengeli Fon Sepeti Fonu) and EPK (Emaa Blue Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, AHV leads in 7 and EPK leads in 2. AHV is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EPK is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AHV leads (−0.82% vs −4.41%). 1 week: AHV leads (−0.33% vs −3.85%). 1 month: AHV leads (−1.85% vs −9.80%). 3 months: AHV leads (2.01% vs −4.35%). 6 months: AHV leads (9.05% vs −14.56%). YTD: AHV leads (27.51% vs −11.55%). Size (TRY): EPK leads (178.9M vs 127.2M). Investors: EPK leads (1,140 vs 155). Risk: AHV leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AHV returned 27.51% and EPK returned −11.55%; over the last year AHV returned 33.83% and EPK returned —. Over the last month AHV returned −1.85% and EPK returned −9.80%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AHV has a size of TRY 127.2M with 155 investors, while EPK has a size of TRY 178.9M with 1,140 investors. EPK leads in size and EPK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AHV is 4 out of 7 and that of EPK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.