AGM vs ZFB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AGM (Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Muhafazakar Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ZFB (Ak Portföy Fintek ve Blokzinciri Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AGM | ZFB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.26% | 1.07% |
| 1 week | 0.66% | −2.31% | 2.38% |
| 1 month | 2.58% | −12.36% | −0.76% |
| 3 months | 8.01% | −14.29% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 16.87% | −14.32% | 0.00% |
| YTD | 32.39% | 11.59% | 22.39% |
| 1 year | 38.69% | 15.88% | 28.39% |
| 3 years | 184.59% | 249.39% | 154.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AGM vs ZFB Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AGM (Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Muhafazakar Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ZFB (Ak Portföy Fintek ve Blokzinciri Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 10, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AGM leads in 9 and ZFB leads in 2. AGM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; ZFB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZFB leads (0.26% vs 0.10%). 1 week: AGM leads (0.66% vs −2.31%). 1 month: AGM leads (2.58% vs −12.36%). 3 months: AGM leads (8.01% vs −14.29%). 6 months: AGM leads (16.87% vs −14.32%). YTD: AGM leads (32.39% vs 11.59%). 1 year: AGM leads (38.69% vs 15.88%). 3 years: ZFB leads (249.39% vs 184.59%). Size (TRY): AGM leads (788.1M vs 773.2M). Investors: AGM leads (53,675 vs 13,355). Risk: AGM leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AGM or ZFB?
Year to date AGM returned 32.39% and ZFB returned 11.59%; over the last year AGM returned 38.69% and ZFB returned 15.88%. Over the last month AGM returned 2.58% and ZFB returned −12.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AGM or ZFB?
As of November 10, 2026, AGM has a size of TRY 788.1M with 53,675 investors, while ZFB has a size of TRY 773.2M with 13,355 investors. AGM leads in size and AGM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AGM and ZFB mean?
The CMB risk score of AGM is 3 out of 7 and that of ZFB is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.