AGB vs GZL Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AGB (Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Büyüme Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZL (Garanti Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AGB | GZL | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.68% | −0.09% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | 0.62% | −1.75% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −1.55% | −3.01% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 3.25% | 2.40% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 12.01% | 11.89% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 16.59% | 32.54% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 24.94% | 42.46% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 93.44% | 83.47% | 161.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AGB vs GZL Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AGB (Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Büyüme Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZL (Garanti Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AGB leads in 7 and GZL leads in 4. AGB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GZL is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: AGB leads (0.68% vs −0.09%). 1 week: AGB leads (0.62% vs −1.75%). 1 month: AGB leads (−1.55% vs −3.01%). 3 months: AGB leads (3.25% vs 2.40%). 6 months: AGB leads (12.01% vs 11.89%). YTD: GZL leads (32.54% vs 16.59%). 1 year: GZL leads (42.46% vs 24.94%). 3 years: AGB leads (93.44% vs 83.47%). Size (TRY): GZL leads (363.9M vs 351.8M). Investors: AGB leads (16,132 vs 6,055). Risk: GZL leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AGB or GZL?
Year to date AGB returned 16.59% and GZL returned 32.54%; over the last year AGB returned 24.94% and GZL returned 42.46%. Over the last month AGB returned −1.55% and GZL returned −3.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AGB or GZL?
As of September 28, 2026, AGB has a size of TRY 351.8M with 16,132 investors, while GZL has a size of TRY 363.9M with 6,055 investors. GZL leads in size and AGB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AGB and GZL mean?
The CMB risk score of AGB is 6 out of 7 and that of GZL is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.