AFS vs ICZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFS (Ak Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and ICZ (Ak Portföy Teknoloji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AFS | ICZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −3.05% | −0.83% |
| Daily | 0.40% | −3.62% | −1.77% |
| 1 week | 1.08% | −3.32% | −2.74% |
| 1 month | −0.47% | −25.84% | −7.45% |
| 3 months | 13.32% | −18.49% | −4.07% |
| 6 months | 20.19% | 1.11% | 6.56% |
| YTD | 19.10% | 18.83% | 18.36% |
| 1 year | 39.61% | 13.61% | 19.84% |
| 3 years | 104.51% | 125.72% | 91.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AFS vs ICZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AFS (Ak Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and ICZ (Ak Portföy Teknoloji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFS leads in 9 and ICZ leads in 1. AFS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ICZ is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: AFS leads (0.40% vs −3.62%). 1 week: AFS leads (1.08% vs −3.32%). 1 month: AFS leads (−0.47% vs −25.84%). 3 months: AFS leads (13.32% vs −18.49%). 6 months: AFS leads (20.19% vs 1.11%). YTD: AFS leads (19.10% vs 18.83%). 1 year: AFS leads (39.61% vs 13.61%). 3 years: ICZ leads (125.72% vs 104.51%). Size (TRY): AFS leads (900M vs 887.4M). Investors: AFS leads (28,349 vs 21,000).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AFS or ICZ?
Year to date AFS returned 19.10% and ICZ returned 18.83%; over the last year AFS returned 39.61% and ICZ returned 13.61%. Over the last month AFS returned −0.47% and ICZ returned −25.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AFS or ICZ?
As of September 29, 2026, AFS has a size of TRY 900M with 28,349 investors, while ICZ has a size of TRY 887.4M with 21,000 investors. AFS leads in size and AFS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AFS and ICZ mean?
The CMB risk score of AFS is — out of 7 and that of ICZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.