AFJ vs SVB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFJ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AFJ | SVB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −0.48% | −0.77% |
| Daily | −0.26% | −2.25% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | 0.04% | −3.66% | −0.98% |
| 1 month | 1.35% | −9.21% | −1.82% |
| 3 months | 7.37% | −8.18% | 3.78% |
| 6 months | 18.85% | −0.01% | 14.04% |
| YTD | 29.33% | 7.64% | 24.40% |
| 1 year | 42.38% | 14.20% | 34.17% |
| 3 years | 235.02% | 129.86% | 157.59% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AFJ vs SVB Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AFJ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AFJ leads in 10 and SVB leads in 1. AFJ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; SVB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Strateji Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: AFJ leads (−0.26% vs −2.25%). 1 week: AFJ leads (0.04% vs −3.66%). 1 month: AFJ leads (1.35% vs −9.21%). 3 months: AFJ leads (7.37% vs −8.18%). 6 months: AFJ leads (18.85% vs −0.01%). YTD: AFJ leads (29.33% vs 7.64%). 1 year: AFJ leads (42.38% vs 14.20%). 3 years: AFJ leads (235.02% vs 129.86%). Size (TRY): SVB leads (178.2M vs 176.3M). Investors: AFJ leads (3,001 vs 1,105). Risk: AFJ leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AFJ or SVB?
Year to date AFJ returned 29.33% and SVB returned 7.64%; over the last year AFJ returned 42.38% and SVB returned 14.20%. Over the last month AFJ returned 1.35% and SVB returned −9.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AFJ or SVB?
As of September 29, 2026, AFJ has a size of TRY 176.3M with 3,001 investors, while SVB has a size of TRY 178.2M with 1,105 investors. SVB leads in size and AFJ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AFJ and SVB mean?
The CMB risk score of AFJ is 2 out of 7 and that of SVB is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.