Yatırımcı.AI

ACU vs ONN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ONN (Aktif Portföy Aktif Oniks Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

ACUONN
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

ACU vs ONN Fund Comparison
MetricACUONNCategory median
Daily0.07%0.22%0.19%
1 week0.46%0.60%0.42%
1 month1.99%2.54%0.94%
3 months6.30%9.32%5.89%
6 months12.88%20.31%12.86%
YTD17.99%30.80%18.07%
1 year24.52%44.86%24.44%
3 years114.46%249.98%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the ACU vs ONN comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ONN (Aktif Portföy Aktif Oniks Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ACU leads in 1 and ONN leads in 10. ACU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ONN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ONN leads (0.22% vs 0.07%). 1 week: ONN leads (0.60% vs 0.46%). 1 month: ONN leads (2.54% vs 1.99%). 3 months: ONN leads (9.32% vs 6.30%). 6 months: ONN leads (20.31% vs 12.88%). YTD: ONN leads (30.80% vs 17.99%). 1 year: ONN leads (44.86% vs 24.52%). 3 years: ONN leads (249.98% vs 114.46%). Size (TRY): ACU leads (1.5B vs 1.4B). Investors: ONN leads (529 vs 131). Risk: ONN leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date ACU returned 17.99% and ONN returned 30.80%; over the last year ACU returned 24.52% and ONN returned 44.86%. Over the last month ACU returned 1.99% and ONN returned 2.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ACU has a size of TRY 1.5B with 131 investors, while ONN has a size of TRY 1.4B with 529 investors. ACU leads in size and ONN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ACU is 5 out of 7 and that of ONN is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.