Yatırımcı.AI

ONN vs YPF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ONN (Aktif Portföy Aktif Oniks Serbest (TL) Fon) and YPF (Yapı Kredi Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) side by side.

ONNYPF
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

ONN vs YPF Fund Comparison
MetricONNYPFCategory median
Daily0.22%0.36%0.19%
1 week0.60%0.63%0.42%
1 month2.54%−0.05%0.94%
3 months9.32%8.53%5.89%
6 months20.31%26.89%12.86%
YTD30.80%36.82%18.07%
1 year44.86%52.36%24.44%
3 years249.98%166.89%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the ONN vs YPF comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ONN (Aktif Portföy Aktif Oniks Serbest (TL) Fon) and YPF (Yapı Kredi Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ONN leads in 5 and YPF leads in 6. ONN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YPF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YPF leads (0.36% vs 0.22%). 1 week: YPF leads (0.63% vs 0.60%). 1 month: ONN leads (2.54% vs −0.05%). 3 months: ONN leads (9.32% vs 8.53%). 6 months: YPF leads (26.89% vs 20.31%). YTD: YPF leads (36.82% vs 30.80%). 1 year: YPF leads (52.36% vs 44.86%). 3 years: ONN leads (249.98% vs 166.89%). Size (TRY): ONN leads (1.4B vs 1.4B). Investors: YPF leads (595 vs 529). Risk: ONN leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date ONN returned 30.80% and YPF returned 36.82%; over the last year ONN returned 44.86% and YPF returned 52.36%. Over the last month ONN returned 2.54% and YPF returned −0.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ONN has a size of TRY 1.4B with 529 investors, while YPF has a size of TRY 1.4B with 595 investors. ONN leads in size and YPF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ONN is 3 out of 7 and that of YPF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.