Yatırımcı.AI

ACU vs DNP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and DNP (Deniz Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

ACUDNP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

ACU vs DNP Fund Comparison
MetricACUDNPCategory median
Daily0.07%0.27%0.19%
1 week0.46%0.64%0.42%
1 month1.99%3.13%0.94%
3 months6.30%9.94%5.89%
6 months12.88%21.63%12.86%
YTD17.99%32.18%18.07%
1 year24.52%46.01%24.44%
3 years114.46%—111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the ACU vs DNP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and DNP (Deniz Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ACU leads in 0 and DNP leads in 10. ACU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; DNP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş.

Highlights: Daily: DNP leads (0.27% vs 0.07%). 1 week: DNP leads (0.64% vs 0.46%). 1 month: DNP leads (3.13% vs 1.99%). 3 months: DNP leads (9.94% vs 6.30%). 6 months: DNP leads (21.63% vs 12.88%). YTD: DNP leads (32.18% vs 17.99%). 1 year: DNP leads (46.01% vs 24.52%). Size (TRY): DNP leads (1.5B vs 1.5B). Investors: DNP leads (401 vs 131). Risk: DNP leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date ACU returned 17.99% and DNP returned 32.18%; over the last year ACU returned 24.52% and DNP returned 46.01%. Over the last month ACU returned 1.99% and DNP returned 3.13%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ACU has a size of TRY 1.5B with 131 investors, while DNP has a size of TRY 1.5B with 401 investors. DNP leads in size and DNP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ACU is 5 out of 7 and that of DNP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.