ACD vs GZL Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACD (İstanbul Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and GZL (Garanti Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ACD | GZL | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −0.37% | — | −0.86% |
| Daily | −1.85% | −0.94% | −1.35% |
| 1 week | −3.35% | −2.54% | −2.09% |
| 1 month | −7.47% | −5.30% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | −5.28% | −6.71% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | 0.77% | −0.08% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 17.39% | 25.67% | 20.04% |
| 1 year | 24.42% | 33.48% | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 155.78% | 81.04% | 156.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ACD vs GZL Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ACD (İstanbul Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and GZL (Garanti Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ACD leads in 3 and GZL leads in 7. ACD is a Variable Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZL is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZL leads (−0.94% vs −1.85%). 1 week: GZL leads (−2.54% vs −3.35%). 1 month: GZL leads (−5.30% vs −7.47%). 3 months: ACD leads (−5.28% vs −6.71%). 6 months: ACD leads (0.77% vs −0.08%). YTD: GZL leads (25.67% vs 17.39%). 1 year: GZL leads (33.48% vs 24.42%). 3 years: ACD leads (155.78% vs 81.04%). Size (TRY): GZL leads (367.2M vs 310M). Investors: GZL leads (5,672 vs 1,287).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ACD or GZL?
Year to date ACD returned 17.39% and GZL returned 25.67%; over the last year ACD returned 24.42% and GZL returned 33.48%. Over the last month ACD returned −7.47% and GZL returned −5.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ACD or GZL?
As of October 23, 2026, ACD has a size of TRY 310M with 1,287 investors, while GZL has a size of TRY 367.2M with 5,672 investors. GZL leads in size and GZL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ACD and GZL mean?
The CMB risk score of ACD is 5 out of 7 and that of GZL is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.