Yatırımcı.AI

AAS vs ESP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AAS (Ata Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fonu) and ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) side by side.

AASESP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AAS vs ESP Fund Comparison
MetricAASESPCategory median
Daily−0.03%4.31%0.05%
1 week−0.07%−6.93%0.44%
1 month0.44%−27.41%0.38%
3 months9.08%−47.81%3.95%
6 months16.26%−63.48%8.45%
YTD25.95%−75.19%16.06%
1 year32.72%−77.60%20.98%
3 years126.02%−83.54%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AAS vs ESP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AAS (Ata Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fonu) and ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AAS leads in 9 and ESP leads in 2. AAS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ESP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ESP leads (4.31% vs −0.03%). 1 week: AAS leads (−0.07% vs −6.93%). 1 month: AAS leads (0.44% vs −27.41%). 3 months: AAS leads (9.08% vs −47.81%). 6 months: AAS leads (16.26% vs −63.48%). YTD: AAS leads (25.95% vs −75.19%). 1 year: AAS leads (32.72% vs −77.60%). 3 years: AAS leads (126.02% vs −83.54%). Size (TRY): AAS leads (16.9M vs 13.1M). Investors: ESP leads (215 vs 126). Risk: AAS leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AAS returned 25.95% and ESP returned −75.19%; over the last year AAS returned 32.72% and ESP returned −77.60%. Over the last month AAS returned 0.44% and ESP returned −27.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, AAS has a size of TRY 16.9M with 126 investors, while ESP has a size of TRY 13.1M with 215 investors. AAS leads in size and ESP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AAS is 5 out of 7 and that of ESP is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.