TUPRS vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of TUPRS and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | TUPRS | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 398.25 | 1.75 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −1.91% | −3.85% | −5.92% |
| Market cap | TRY 767.3B | TRY 1.1B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 10.75 | 2.32 | 17.25 |
| P/B | 1.72 | 0.19 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 4.00% | — | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 18.20% | 9.45% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 49.42% | 79.42% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the TUPRS vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of TUPRS (Tüpraş) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:58. Of the 15 metrics compared, TUPRS leads in 7 and GLRYH leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.91% vs −3.85%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 767.3B vs TRY 1.1B). P/E: GLRYH leads (2.32 vs 10.75). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 6.43). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): TUPRS leads (10.32% vs −42.31%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TUPRS or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, GLRYH is cheaper (10.75 vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (1.72 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, TUPRS or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is 7.07% for TUPRS and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is 18.20% for TUPRS and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, TUPRS or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 46.13 for TUPRS and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is −1.23 for TUPRS and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.