CIMSA vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CIMSA and GUBRF side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CIMSA | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 41.98 | 435.00 | 15.63 |
| Daily change | −1.92% | −5.02% | −6.81% |
| Market cap | TRY 39.7B | TRY 145.3B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 9.32 | 19.22 | 25.12 |
| P/B | 1.08 | 3.89 | 0.99 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | — | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 12.50% | 23.87% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 45.08% | 20.28% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CIMSA vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CIMSA (Cimsa) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:17. Of the 16 metrics compared, CIMSA leads in 5 and GUBRF leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−1.92% vs −5.02%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 145.3B vs TRY 39.7B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 19.22). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: CIMSA leads (8.12 vs 11.70). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 17.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs 18.96%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CIMSA or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (9.32 vs 19.22); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (1.08 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, CIMSA or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is 9.76% for CIMSA and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is 12.50% for CIMSA and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, CIMSA or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 52.21 for CIMSA and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is 3.11 for CIMSA and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.