SAMAT vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of SAMAT and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | SAMAT | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 4.07 | 292.50 | 16.67 |
| Daily change | −3.55% | 0.86% | −4.37% |
| Market cap | TRY 457.5M | TRY 96.5B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | 3.15 | — | 6.90 |
| P/B | 0.64 | 12.48 | 1.28 |
| Return on equity | 26.15% | −13.03% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 78.90% | 0.54% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the SAMAT vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of SAMAT (Saray Matbaacilik) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:23. Of the 12 metrics compared, SAMAT leads in 5 and KENT leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −3.55%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 457.5M). P/B: SAMAT leads (0.64 vs 12.48). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.82 vs 34,240.99). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs −22.99%). EBITDA margin (annual): KENT leads (5.65% vs −258,692.48%). Net margin (annual): SAMAT leads (406.63% vs −6.14%). Return on assets: SAMAT leads (18.22% vs −7.29%).
Frequently asked questions
Is SAMAT or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (3.15 vs —); by P/B, SAMAT trades at the lower multiple (0.64 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, SAMAT or KENT?
Annual net margin is 406.63% for SAMAT and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 26.15% for SAMAT and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, SAMAT or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 26.52 for SAMAT and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is — for SAMAT and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.