KENT vs GIPTA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and GIPTA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KENT | GIPTA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 292.50 | 31.14 | 10.98 |
| Daily change | 0.86% | −1.14% | −4.10% |
| Market cap | TRY 96.5B | TRY 4.1B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/B | 12.48 | 1.16 | 0.89 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.02% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | −9.37% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 45.46% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KENT vs GIPTA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and GIPTA (Gipta Ofis Kirtasiye) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, KENT leads in 4 and GIPTA leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −1.14%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 4.1B). P/B: GIPTA leads (1.16 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: GIPTA leads (7.35 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: GIPTA leads (6.37 vs 11.82). Gross margin: GIPTA leads (46.90% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): GIPTA leads (20.03% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): KENT leads (−6.14% vs −15.29%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KENT or GIPTA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, GIPTA trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 1.16).
Which is more profitable, KENT or GIPTA?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and −15.29% for GIPTA; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and −9.37% for GIPTA.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or GIPTA?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 17.75 for GIPTA; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and −4.05 for GIPTA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.