RUZYE vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of RUZYE and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | RUZYE | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 4.76 | 75.00 | 15.55 |
| Daily change | −8.11% | −2.34% | −6.68% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.3B | TRY 263.2B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | — | 8.12 | 25.12 |
| P/B | 0.85 | 1.50 | 0.99 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | −8.31% | 19.65% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 67.09% | 17.66% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the RUZYE vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of RUZYE (Ruzy Madencilik ve Enerji) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:55. Of the 14 metrics compared, RUZYE leads in 5 and FROTO leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.34% vs −8.11%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.2B vs TRY 1.3B). P/B: RUZYE leads (0.85 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs −192.10). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 8.57). Gross margin: FROTO leads (6.87% vs −31.85%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs −1.79%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −54.70%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is RUZYE or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 8.12); by P/B, RUZYE trades at the lower multiple (0.85 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, RUZYE or FROTO?
Annual net margin is −54.70% for RUZYE and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is −8.31% for RUZYE and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, RUZYE or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 22.91 for RUZYE and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is — for RUZYE and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.