FROTO vs GLRMK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and GLRMK side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FROTO | GLRMK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.95 | 141.10 | 20.77 |
| Daily change | −2.41% | −3.88% | −4.16% |
| Market cap | TRY 263B | TRY 45.5B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | 12.19 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 1.67 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | 17.35% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 25.53% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FROTO vs GLRMK comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:31. Of the 16 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 8 and GLRMK leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.41% vs −3.88%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263B vs TRY 45.5B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 12.19). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 1.67). EV/EBITDA: GLRMK leads (8.02 vs 9.18). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 2.14). Gross margin: GLRMK leads (13.29% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): GLRMK leads (12.63% vs 6.30%).
Frequently asked questions
Is FROTO or GLRMK cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (8.12 vs 12.19); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 1.67).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or GLRMK?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and 8.37% for GLRMK; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and 17.35% for GLRMK.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or GLRMK?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 64.52 for GLRMK; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and −0.07 for GLRMK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.