QNBFK vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of QNBFK and CIMSA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | QNBFK | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 35.22 | 42.44 | 10.42 |
| Daily change | −3.77% | −0.84% | −5.48% |
| Market cap | TRY 88.1B | TRY 40.1B | TRY 7.6B |
| P/E | 43.08 | 9.32 | 3.40 |
| P/B | 11.22 | 1.08 | 0.89 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.50% | — |
| Return on equity | 30.06% | 12.50% | 33.74% |
| Free float | 0.60% | 45.08% | 31.44% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the QNBFK vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of QNBFK (Qnb Finansal Kiralama) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:00. Of the 7 metrics compared, QNBFK leads in 3 and CIMSA leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−0.84% vs −3.77%). Market cap: QNBFK leads (TRY 88.1B vs TRY 40.1B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 43.08). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 11.22). Net margin (annual): QNBFK leads (189.09% vs 9.76%). Return on assets: CIMSA leads (4.70% vs 3.77%). Return on equity: QNBFK leads (30.06% vs 12.50%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is QNBFK or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (43.08 vs 9.32); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (11.22 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, QNBFK or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is 189.09% for QNBFK and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is 30.06% for QNBFK and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, QNBFK or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is — for QNBFK and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is — for QNBFK and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.