QNBFK vs GARFA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of QNBFK and GARFA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | QNBFK | GARFA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 36.78 | 22.90 | 10.52 |
| Daily change | 0.49% | −3.70% | −3.14% |
| Market cap | TRY 91.9B | TRY 9.1B | TRY 7.9B |
| P/E | 43.08 | 3.60 | 3.60 |
| P/B | 11.22 | 1.40 | 0.95 |
| Return on equity | 30.06% | 45.56% | 33.74% |
| Free float | 0.60% | 8.37% | 31.44% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the QNBFK vs GARFA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of QNBFK (Qnb Finansal Kiralama) and GARFA (Garanti Faktoring) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 7 metrics compared, QNBFK leads in 3 and GARFA leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: QNBFK leads (0.49% vs −3.70%). Market cap: QNBFK leads (TRY 91.9B vs TRY 9.1B). P/E: GARFA leads (3.60 vs 43.08). P/B: GARFA leads (1.40 vs 11.22). Net margin (annual): QNBFK leads (189.09% vs 18.74%). Return on assets: GARFA leads (7.06% vs 3.77%). Return on equity: GARFA leads (45.56% vs 30.06%).
Frequently asked questions
Is QNBFK or GARFA cheaper?
By P/E, GARFA is cheaper (43.08 vs 3.60); by P/B, GARFA trades at the lower multiple (11.22 vs 1.40).
Which is more profitable, QNBFK or GARFA?
Annual net margin is 189.09% for QNBFK and 18.74% for GARFA; return on equity is 30.06% for QNBFK and 45.56% for GARFA.
Which is more leveraged, QNBFK or GARFA?
The leverage ratio is — for QNBFK and — for GARFA; net debt/EBITDA is — for QNBFK and — for GARFA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.