PCILT vs SMART Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of PCILT and SMART side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PCILT | SMART | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 30.36 | 15.84 | 16.30 |
| Daily change | −1.11% | −8.28% | −5.37% |
| Market cap | TRY 3.6B | TRY 504.7M | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | 6.90 | — | 6.82 |
| P/B | 1.42 | 1.07 | 1.24 |
| Dividend yield | 8.49% | — | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | 25.01% | −9.10% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 34.99% | 93.23% | 34.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PCILT vs SMART Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of PCILT (Pc İletişim Medya) and SMART (Smartiks Yazilim) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:01. Of the 14 metrics compared, PCILT leads in 10 and SMART leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: PCILT leads (−1.11% vs −8.28%). Market cap: PCILT leads (TRY 3.6B vs TRY 504.7M). P/B: SMART leads (1.07 vs 1.42). EV/EBITDA: PCILT leads (4.10 vs 9.52). EV/Sales: PCILT leads (0.42 vs 6.01). Gross margin: SMART leads (78.51% vs 8.12%). EBITDA margin (annual): SMART leads (51.21% vs 5.45%). Net margin (annual): PCILT leads (4.72% vs −32.00%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is PCILT or SMART cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (6.90 vs —); by P/B, SMART trades at the lower multiple (1.42 vs 1.07).
Which is more profitable, PCILT or SMART?
Annual net margin is 4.72% for PCILT and −32.00% for SMART; return on equity is 25.01% for PCILT and −9.10% for SMART.
Which is more leveraged, PCILT or SMART?
The leverage ratio is 53.71 for PCILT and 47.56 for SMART; net debt/EBITDA is −1.87 for PCILT and 1.71 for SMART. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.